Tuesday 5 May 2015

'mystic' Karl Rahner, 'Christ the vine' Cyril of Alexandria



Bearing Much Fruit

Christ the True Vine       

  http://www.catholiclane.com/bearing-much-fruit/christ-the-true-vine/    
COMMENT:
The Gospel of Sunday of 5th Week of Easter is repeated on Wednesday of the week.
Gospel John 15:1-8, "I am the true vine, and my Father is the vinedresser. ...."

For the Sunday Homily, we are indebted to Redemptorist Publication 'The Living Word, quoting Karl Rahner, "The Christian of the future will either be a 'mystic' ... or ... will cease to be anything at all."  
For the Tuesday Patristic Reading, John by Saint Cyril of Alexandria, bishop
(Lib. 10, 2: PG 74, 331-334),
I am the vine, you are the branches




"Make your home in me, as I make mine in you."

Illustration
Karl Rahner SJ, one of the great theologians of the last century, wrote many books in which he tried to make sense of the Catholic faith for his contemporaries. That's what a theologian has to do. Towards the end of his life he wrote an influential essay on the future of the Christian faith. It began with this provocative statement: "The Christian of the future will either be a 'mystic' ... or ... will cease to be anything at all."

Did he mean that we must all have visions like St Teresa of Avila? Karl Rahner thought that the old Catholic culture that he had known as a boy was fast disappearing, eroded by an increasingly secular world. It meant that the average Christian could not depend on a Christian culture that everyone took for granted. So he thought that unless Christians had a deep and personal experience of God they would not be able to keep up the practice of their faith. That is all he meant by saying that each person needed to be a mystic. No matter how big the institutional Church seems to be, if its members do not have in them the life blood of a personal encounter with God, then it will wither away.

Gospel Teaching
Jesus took for granted that his Jewish faith needed laws and institutions like the Temple if it was going to transmit its message to the next generation. And so he knew that his Church must be built on the rock of Peter; then God would preserve it from all its enemies. But in today's Gospel, he tells his disciples at the Last Supper that if they are to survive they must remain close to him. He takes the image of the vineyard, which was used to represent Israel in the Old Testament, and in a sense identifies himself with it by saying: "I am the true vine, and my Father is the vinedresser."

If the disciples are to survive then they must be branches of Jesus, the vine. And just as a vine is pruned to make it more fruitful, the disciples will also grow by being tested in their faith. Jesus tells them to remain close to him and have the living sap flowing in their branches, or else they will shrivel up. He insists that at the heart of their faith there is this close personal relationship with him: "Make your home in me, as I make mine in you." As they are united in Christ so they will be united through him to the Father. But this experience is not just for special members of the Church, like the apostles. The Spirit is given to everyone. All are called to have this "mystic" experience of being so close to Christ in their daily life that they produce good fruit.

Application
It is easy to get carried along by externals. The Church is essential to our faith. We cannot say, as some do, that we want Jesus but not the Church. In the Creed we affirm our belief in Jesus Christ and also in "one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church". The institutional Church is a key part of our faith, but there is always the danger of just going through the motions and dying on the vine. The institution will shrivel unless its members have the sap of the living Christ flowing through them.

As Karl Rahner pointed out, it is much more difficult now to be carried along by other people's faith in a society that is both secular and often hostile to our beliefs. How can we produce the fruit that will show that Christ's Church is alive and well? We do not need to be mystics like some of the great saints, but to make sure our practice of the faith, whether it is going to Mass or saying our prayers, is firmly based on a close personal relationship with Jesus. We don't at first have to do anything but rather to be at peace in his presence, to allow him to dwell in us: Then we can share a deep communion with him as we receive his body and blood in the Eucharist. If we change the image from sap, we could say that his real presence in his blood gives us new life. If we do have this close relationship of the branch to the "true vine", then it will produce good fruits especially in the way we love God and one another.


Summary
1.                   We are all called to have a personal experience of God.
2.                   The institutional Church is necessary but its members must be branches of Christ, the vine; we will only be alive if we dwell in him and he in us.
3.                   Our faith is to be inspired by this personal close relationship with Christ so that the Church will produce good fruits.  +++++++++++  

iBreviary

Tuesday, 5 May 2015
Tuesday of the Fifth Week of Easter
Type: Weekday - Time: Easter
SECOND READING

From a commentary on the gospel of John by Saint Cyril of Alexandria, bishop
(Lib. 10, 2: PG 74, 331-334)

I am the vine, you are the branches


The Lord calls himself the vine and those united to him branches in order to teach us how much we shall benefit from our union with him, and how important it is for us to remain in his love. By receiving the Holy Spirit, who is the bond of union between us and Christ our Savior, those who are joined to him, as branches are to a vine, share in his own nature.

On the part of those who come to the vine, their union with him depends upon a deliberate act of the will; on his part, the union is effected by grace. Because we had good will, we made the act of faith that brought us to Christ, and received from him the dignity of adoptive sonship that made us his own kinsmen, according to the words of Saint Paul: He who is joined to the Lord is one spirit with him.

The prophet Isaiah calls Christ the foundation, because it is upon him that we as living and spiritual stones are built into a holy priesthood to be a dwelling place for God in the Spirit. Upon no other foundation than Christ can this temple be built. Here Christ is teaching the same truth by calling himself the vine, since the vine is the parent of its branches, and provides their nourishment.

From Christ and in Christ, we have been reborn through the Spirit in order to bear the fruit of life; not the fruit of our old, sinful life but the fruit of a new life founded upon our faith in him and our love for him. Like branches growing from a vine, we now draw our life from Christ, and we cling to his holy commandment in order to preserve this life. Eager to safeguard the blessing of our noble birth, we are careful not to grieve the Holy Spirit who dwells in us, and who makes us aware of God’s presence in us.

Let the wisdom of John teach us how we live in Christ and Christ lives in us: The proof that we are living in him and he is living in us is that he has given us a share in his Spirit. Just as the trunk of the vine gives its own natural properties to each of its branches, so, by bestowing on them the Holy Spirit, the Word of God, the only-begotten Son of the Father, gives Christians a certain kinship with himself and with God the Father because they have been united to him by faith and determination to do his will in all things. He helps them to grow in love and reverence for God, and teaches them to discern right from wrong and to act with integrity.

RESPONSORY
John 15:4, 16


Live in me as I live in you.
 Just as a branch cannot bear fruit of itself apart from the vine,
so you cannot bear fruit unless you live on in me, alleluia.

I chose you to go out and bear fruit,
a fruit that will last.
 Just as a branch cannot bear fruit of itself apart from the vine,
so you cannot bear fruit unless you live on in me, alleluia.

CONCLUDING PRAYER

Let us pray.

Father,
you restored your people to eternal life
by raising Christ your Son from death.
Make our faith strong and our hope sure.
May we never doubt that you will fulfill
the promises you have made.
Grant this through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son,
who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit,
one God, for ever and ever.
 Amen.

Sunday 3 May 2015

Dom Donald's Blog: May of Mary. Gospel Fifth Sunday of the Easter B -...

Dom Donald's Blog: May of Mary. Gospel Fifth Sunday of the Easter B -...: Our Lady of Month of May; Remember, China,   "Our Lady of Sheshan". Sunday Gospel Reflection With Fr. Bill Grimm 2015.05.03   ...



Backup to missing iPad

Saturday 2 May 2015

May of Mary. Gospel Fifth Sunday of the Easter B - May 3, 2015

Our Lady of Month of May; Remember,
China,  "Our Lady of Sheshan".

Sunday Gospel Reflection With Fr. Bill Grimm 2015.05.03   


Published on 27 Apr 2015
In the Acts of the Apostles, Saul shows what love calls for. He continues to proclaim the fact that he has met the Lord though no one trusts him and some even want to kill him. That is the basic vocation to which all followers of Jesus are called.
_________________________________________
OUR LADY OF SHESHAN PRAYER
FOR THE CHURCH IN CHINA –
Shanghai Basilica of Mary
 Our Lady of Sheshan  

campus.udayton.edu/mary/resources/.../China-OL-SheShan.htmlCached
... Our Lady of Sheshan  was
proclaimed the patron ... The Image of Our Lady of She
... to bring our testimony of love in connection with this chosen
corner ...

The Shrine of Our Lady of Sheshan

Location:
   
Shanghai_-_Basilique_de_She_Shan_Our Lady of Sheshan   


 Sheshan Basilica of Mary, Help of
Christians is located on the peak of Sheshan in Songjiang district in
Shanghai. It is One of the most prominent pilgrimage shrines in China, it is
well-known both far and wide in China and overseas.
History
The
Catholic faith was introduced in the Songjiang district for a long time. For
more than one-hundred years, when the Catholic religion was banned, Catholics
had been practicing their faith underground. In 1844, a Jesuit priest Fr.
Claude Gotteland, SJ, came to Sheshan and was very much impressed by the
serenity and beauty of the area. He decided to build a house of prayer for
the retired priests. However, he died in 1856 before his dream was realized.
In 1863, his successor, Fr. Joseph Gonnet, SJ came to Sheshan. He purchased
the whole hill top as well as the southern slope and began to build religious
houses with a chapel half way on the slope for convalescence of missionaries.
The following year, Fr. Desjacques Marin built a hexagonal pavilion for the
statue of our Lady. On Mar 1 1868, Bishop Msgr. Adrien Languillat, SJ
consecrated the chapel and blessed the portrait of Our Lady, Help of
Christians, which was copied from Our Lady of Victory, in Paris On the feast
day of Our Lady, Help of Christians, hundreds of pilgrims came and
participated outside the chapel where Mass was held in a tent. During the
Taiping Uprising, the Catholic Church was being attacked. In Shanghai, there
were many incidents of prejudice and unrest. The Jesuit Superior Fr. A. Della
Corte, SJ climbed up the mountain of Sheshan. He went in front of the statue
of Our Lady and made a vow that if the area was spared in this turmoil and
danger, he would build a church on the location. The prayer was heard and the
diocese stood unharmed. In September 1870, he appealed to the generous
Catholics to fulfill his vow and to thank our Lady for her protection.

Easter Daffodils, Nunraw
PRAYER OF HIS HOLINESS BENEDICT XVI

TO OUR LADY OF SHESHAN

ON THE OCCASION OF THE WORLD DAY OF PRAYER

FOR THE CHURCH IN CHINA (24 MAY 2008)


Virgin Most Holy, Mother of the
Incarnate Word and our Mother,

venerated in the Shrine of Sheshan under the title "Help of
Christians",

the entire Church in China looks to you with devout affection.

We come before you today to implore your protection.

Look upon the People of God and, with a mother’s care, guide them

along the paths of truth and love, so that they may always be

a leaven of harmonious coexistence among all citizens.
When
you obediently said "yes" in the house of Nazareth,

you allowed God’s eternal Son to take flesh in your virginal womb

and thus to begin in history the work of our redemption.

You willingly and generously cooperated in that work,

allowing the sword of pain to pierce your soul,

until the supreme hour of the Cross, when you kept watch on Calvary,

standing beside your Son, who died that we might live.
From
that moment, you became, in a new way,

the Mother of all those who receive your Son Jesus in faith

and choose to follow in his footsteps by taking up his Cross.

Mother of hope, in the darkness of Holy Saturday you journeyed

with unfailing trust towards the dawn of Easter.

Grant that your children may discern at all times,

even those that are darkest, the signs of God’s loving presence.
Our
Lady of Sheshan, sustain all those in China,

who, amid their daily trials, continue to believe, to hope, to love.

May they never be afraid to speak of Jesus to the world,

and of the world to Jesus.

In the statue overlooking the Shrine you lift your Son on high,

offering him to the world with open arms in a gesture of love.

Help Catholics always to be credible witnesses to this love,

ever clinging to the rock of Peter on which the Church is built.

Mother of China and all Asia, pray for us, now and for ever. Amen!


Jiangsu Province, the Shrine of Our
Lady of.























      

Saint Athanasius 2 May 2015 Introduction by C. S. Lewis

Patristic Lectionary,

COMMENT: Introduction   by C. S. Lewis  

Breviary

Saturday, 2 May 2015
Saturday of the Fourth Week of Easter
Type: Weekday - Time: Easter

SECOND READING

From a discourse by Saint Athanasius, bishop
(Oratio de Incarnatione Verbi, 8-9, PG 25, 110-111)

On the incarnation of the Word


The Word of God, incorporeal, incorruptible and immaterial, entered our world. Yet it was not as if he had been remote from it up to that time. For there is no part of the world that was ever without his presence; together with his Father, he continually filled all things and places.

Out of his loving-kindness for us he came to us, and we see this in the way he revealed himself openly to us. Taking pity on mankind’s weakness, and moved by our corruption, he could not stand aside and see death have the mastery over us; he did not want creation to perish and his Father’s work in fashioning man to be in vain. He therefore took to himself a body, no different from our own, for he did not wish simply to be in a body or only to be seen.

If he had wanted simply to be seen, he could indeed have taken another, and nobler, body. Instead, he took our body in its reality.

Within the Virgin he built himself a temple, that is, a body; he made it his own instrument in which to dwell and to reveal himself. In this way he received from mankind a body like our own, and, since all were subject to the corruption of death, he delivered this body over to death for all, and with supreme love offered it to the Father. He did so to destroy the law of corruption passed against all men, since all died in him. The law, which had spent its force on the body of the Lord, could no longer have any power over his fellowmen. Moreover, this was the way in which the Word was to restore mankind to immortality, after it had fallen into corruption, and summon it back from death to life. He utterly destroyed the power death had against mankind—as fire consumes chaff—by means of the body he had taken and the grace of the resurrection.

This is the reason why the Word assumed a body that could die, so that this body, sharing in the Word who is above all, might satisfy death’s requirement in place of all. Because of the Word dwelling in that body, it would remain incorruptible, and all would be freed for ever from corruption by the grace of the resurrection.

In death the Word made a spotless sacrifice and oblation of the body he had taken. By dying for others, he immediately banished death for all mankind.

In this way the Word of God, who is above all, dedicated and offered his temple, the instrument that was his body, for us all, as he said, and so paid by his own death the debt that was owed. The immortal Son of God, united with all men by likeness of nature, thus fulfilled all justice in restoring mankind to immortality by the promise of the resurrection.

The corruption of death no longer holds any power over mankind, thanks to the Word, who has come to dwell among them through his one body.

Athanasius: On the Incarnation
De Incarnatione Verbi Dei
This translation was made by Sister Penelope Lawson, of the Anglican Community of St. Mary the Virgin in Wantage, England. It was originally published with a byline that reads only "Translated and edited by A Religious of C.S.M.V."
With Introduction by C. S. Lewis


Athanasius stood contra mundum ("against the world") in defense of the biblical doctrine of Christ. He opposed Arius when it seemed all the world would follow Arius's heresy. Athanasius's work remains even today one of the definitive statements of orthodox Trinitarianism.



Introduction


by C. S. Lewis
here is a strange idea abroad that in every subject the ancient books should be read only by the professionals, and that the amateur should content himself with the modern books. Thus I have found as a tutor in English Literature that if the average student wants to find out something about Platonism, the very last thing he thinks of doing is to take a translation of Plato off the library shelf and read the Symposium. He would rather read some dreary modern book ten times as long, all about "isms" and influences and only once in twelve pages telling him what Plato actually said. The error is rather an amiable one, for it springs from humility. The student is half afraid to meet one of the great philosophers face to face. He feels himself inadequate and thinks he will not understand him. But if he only knew, the great man, just because of his greatness, is much more intelligible than his modern commentator. The simplest student will be able to understand, if not all, yet a very great deal of what Plato said; but hardly anyone can understand some modern books on Platonism. It has always therefore been one of my main endeavours as a teacher to persuade the young that firsthand knowledge is not only more worth acquiring than secondhand knowledge, but is usually much easier and more delightful to acquire.
    This mistaken preference for the modern books and this shyness of the old ones is nowhere more rampant than in theology. Wherever you find a little study circle of Christian laity you can be almost certain that they are studying not St. Luke or St. Paul or St. Augustine or Thomas Aquinas or Hooker or Butler, but M. Berdyaev or M. Maritain or M. Niebuhr or Miss Sayers or even myself.
    Now this seems to me topsy-turvy. Naturally, since I myself am a writer, I do not wish the ordinary reader to read no modern books. But if he must read only the new or only the old, I would advise him to read the old. And I would give him this advice precisely because he is an amateur and therefore much less protected than the expert against the dangers of an exclusive contemporary diet. A new book is still on its trial and the amateur is not in a position to judge it. It has to be tested against the great body of Christian thought down the ages, and all its hidden implications (often unsuspected by the author himself) have to be brought to light. Often it cannot be fully understood without the knowledge of a good many other modern books. If you join at eleven o'clock a conversation which began at eight you will often not see the real bearing of what is said. Remarks which seem to you very ordinary will produce laughter or irritation and you will not see why—the reason, of course, being that the earlier stages of the conversation have given them a special point. In the same way sentences in a modern book which look quite ordinary may be directed at some other book; in this way you may be led to accept what you would have indignantly rejected if you knew its real significance. The only safety is to have a standard of plain, central Christianity ("mere Christianity" as Baxter called it) which puts the controversies of the moment in their proper perspective. Such a standard can be acquired only from the old books. It is a good rule, after reading a new book, never to allow yourself another new one till you have read an old one in between. If that is too much for you, you should at least read one old one to every three new ones.
    Every age has its own outlook. It is specially good at seeing certain truths and specially liable to make certain mistakes. We all, therefore, need the books that will correct the characteristic mistakes of our own period. And that means the old books. All contemporary writers share to some extent the contemporary outlook—even those, like myself, who seem most opposed to it. Nothing strikes me more when I read the controversies of past ages than the fact that both sides were usually assuming without question a good deal which we should now absolutely deny. They thought that they were as completely opposed as two sides could be, but in fact they were all the time secretly united—united with each other and against earlier and later ages—by a great mass of common assumptions. We may be sure that the characteristic blindness of the twentieth century—the blindness about which posterity will ask, "But how could they have thought that?"—lies where we have never suspected it, and concerns something about which there is untroubled agreement between Hitler and President Roosevelt or between Mr. H. G. Wells and Karl Barth. None of us can fully escape this blindness, but we shall certainly increase it, and weaken our guard against it, if we read only modern books. Where they are true they will give us truths which we half knew already. Where they are false they will aggravate the error with which we are already dangerously ill. The only palliative is to keep the clean sea breeze of the centuries blowing through our minds, and this can be done only by reading old books. Not, of course, that there is any magic about the past. People were no cleverer then than they are now; they made as many mistakes as we. But not the same mistakes. They will not flatter us in the errors we are already committing; and their own errors, being now open and palpable, will not endanger us. Two heads are better than one, not because either is infallible, but because they are unlikely to go wrong in the same direction. To be sure, the books of the future would be just as good a corrective as the books of the past, but unfortunately we cannot get at them.
    I myself was first led into reading the Christian classics, almost accidentally, as a result of my English studies. Some, such as Hooker, Herbert, Traherne, Taylor and Bunyan, I read because they are themselves great English writers; others, such as Boethius, St. Augustine, Thomas Aquinas and Dante, because they were "influences." George Macdonald I had found for myself at the age of sixteen and never wavered in my allegiance, though I tried for a long time to ignore his Christianity. They are, you will note, a mixed bag, representative of many Churches, climates and ages. And that brings me to yet another reason for reading them. The divisions of Christendom are undeniable and are by some of these writers most fiercely expressed. But if any man is tempted to think—as one might be tempted who read only con- temporaries—that "Christianity" is a word of so many meanings that it means nothing at all, he can learn beyond all doubt, by stepping out of his own century, that this is not so. Measured against the ages "mere Christianity" turns out to be no insipid interdenominational transparency, but something positive, self-consistent, and inexhaustible. I know it, indeed, to my cost. In the days when I still hated Christianity, I learned to recognise, like some all too familiar smell, that almost unvarying something which met me, now in Puritan Bunyan, now in Anglican Hooker, now in Thomist Dante. It was there (honeyed and floral) in Francois de Sales; it was there (grave and homely) in Spenser and Walton; it was there (grim but manful) in Pascal and Johnson; there again, with a mild, frightening, Paradisial flavour, in Vaughan and Boehme and Traherne. In the urban sobriety of the eighteenth century one was not safe—Law and Butler were two lions in the path. The supposed "Paganism" of the Elizabethans could not keep it out; it lay in wait where a man might have supposed himself safest, in the very centre of The Faerie Queene and the Arcadia. It was, of course, varied; and yet—after all—so unmistakably the same; recognisable, not to be evaded, the odour which is death to us until we allow it to become life:


an air that kills
From yon far country blows.

    We are all rightly distressed, and ashamed also, at the divisions of Christendom. But those who have always lived within the Christian fold may be too easily dispirited by them. They are bad, but such people do not know what it looks like from without. Seen from there, what is left intact despite all the divisions, still appears (as it truly is) an immensely formidable unity. I know, for I saw it; and well our enemies know it. That unity any of us can find by going out of his own age. It is not enough, but it is more than you had thought till then. Once you are well soaked in it, if you then venture to speak, you will have an amusing experience. You will be thought a Papist when you are actually reproducing Bunyan, a Pantheist when you are quoting Aquinas, and so forth. For you have now got on to the great level viaduct which crosses the ages and which looks so high from the valleys, so low from the mountains, so narrow compared with the swamps, and so broad compared with the sheep-tracks.
    The present book is something of an experiment. The translation is intended for the world at large, not only for theological students. If it succeeds, other translations of other great Christian books will presumably follow. In one sense, of course, it is not the first in the field. Translations of the Theologia Germanica, the Imitation, the Scale of Perfection, and the Revelations of Lady Julian of Norwich, are already on the market, and are very valuable, though some of them are not very scholarly. But it will be noticed that these are all books of devotion rather than of doctrine. Now the layman or amateur needs to be instructed as well as to be exhorted. In this age his need for knowledge is particularly pressing. Nor would I admit any sharp division between the two kinds of book. For my own part I tend to find the doctrinal books often more helpful in devotion than the devotional books, and I rather suspect that the same experience may await many others. I believe that many who find that "nothing happens" when they sit down, or kneel down, to a book of devotion, would find that the heart sings unbidden while they are working their way through a tough bit of theology with a pipe in their teeth and a pencil in their hand.
    This is a good translation of a very great book. St. Athanasius has suffered in popular estimation from a certain sentence in the "Athanasian Creed." I will not labour the point that that work is not exactly a creed and was not by St. Athanasius, for I think it is a very fine piece of writing. The words "Which Faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly" are the offence. They are commonly misunderstood. The operative word is keep; not acquire, or even believe, but keep. The author, in fact, is not talking about unbelievers, but about deserters, not about those who have never heard of Christ, nor even those who have misunderstood and refused to accept Him, but of those who having really understood and really believed, then allow themselves, under the sway of sloth or of fashion or any other invited confusion to be drawn away into sub-Christian modes of thought. They are a warning against the curious modern assumption that all changes of belief, however brought about, are necessarily exempt from blame. But this is not my immediate concern. I mention "the creed (commonly called) of St. Athanasius" only to get out of the reader's way what may have been a bogey and to put the true Athanasius in its place. His epitaph is Athanasius contra mundum, "Athanasius against the world." We are proud that our own country has more than once stood against the world. Athanasius did the same. He stood for the Trinitarian doctrine, "whole and undefiled," when it looked as if all the civilised world was slipping back from Christianity into the religion of Arius—into one of those "sensible" synthetic religions which are so strongly recommended today and which, then as now, included among their devotees many highly cultivated clergymen. It is his glory that he did not move with the times; it is his reward that he now remains when those times, as all times do, have moved away.
    When I first opened his De Incarnatione I soon discovered by a very simple test that I was reading a masterpiece. I knew very little Christian Greek except that of the New Testament and I had expected difficulties. To my astonishment I found it almost as easy as Xenophon; and only a master mind could, in the fourth century, have written so deeply on such a subject with such classical simplicity. Every page I read confirmed this impression. His approach to the Miracles is badly needed today, for it is the final answer to those who object to them as "arbitrary and meaningless violations of the laws of Nature." They are here shown to be rather the re-telling in capital letters of the same message which Nature writes in her crabbed cursive hand; the very operations one would expect of Him who was so full of life that when He wished to die He had to "borrow death from others." The whole book, indeed, is a picture of the Tree of Life—a sappy and golden book, full of buoyancy and confidence. We cannot, I admit, appropriate all its confidence today. We cannot point to the high virtue of Christian living and the gay, almost mocking courage of Christian martyrdom, as a proof of our doctrines with quite that assurance which Athanasius takes as a matter of course. But whoever may be to blame for that it is not Athanasius.
    The translator knows so much more Christian Greek than I that it would be out of place for me to praise her version. But it seems to me to be in the right tradition of English translation. I do not think the reader will find here any of that sawdusty quality which is so common in modern renderings from the ancient languages. That is as much as the English reader will notice; those who compare the version with the original will be able to estimate how much wit and talent is presupposed in such a choice, for example, as "these wiseacres" on the very first page.

C. S. LEWIS.




Friday 1 May 2015

Baldwin Cistercian COMMENT from William

Canterbury_Cathedral_Cloisters,_Kent,_UK
   

FOURTH WEEK OF EASTER
THURSDAY  Year I
30 April 2015
Second Reading
From a treatise by Baldwin of Canterbury (Tract.4: PL 204, 429-431.441-442)
The two resurrections

Our Lord's glorious resurrection teaches us that the fruits of obedience are resurrection and life. These were the fruit of the obedience practiced by Christ who is the resurrection and the life personified.


----- Forwarded Message -----
From: William J .....
To: Donald ...... 
Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2015, 17:05
Subject: Re: Baldwin Cistercian 
Dear Father Donald,

Your comment:
Two Resurrections... needs some enlightenment of Baldwin's explanation.

Please may I respond, for the extract fascinates me...

The burden of a twofold mortality [one, by virtue of being a descendant of Adam, the second, of our having fallen of ourselves]
... a single resurrection is not enough to bring us to the blessed life of heaven. We need two.

It is by our faith in and our sacramental imitation of the resurrection of Christ [our earthly ‘conversio’], the resurrection of our soul, through which we are now dead to sin and live for holiness, walking in newness of life... glorying in nothing other than in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ...

As we wait for that redemption of our bodies, at last fully realizing our adoption as God's children, that will take place at the second resurrection [heavenly resurrection], when Christ will refashion these wretched bodies of ours and make them like his own glorious body... that endures for all eternity, a glory that knows no end...

Might that be summed up: [1] if our desire for God is faithfully lived and by heart ‘raised up’, [2] it will lead by God’s grace to the heavenly fulfilment of our desire to see His Face and to be embraced in His Love...

In these thoughts my mind has been enraptured by the passage from Luisa Piccarreta’s ‘The Holy Mass and Bodily Resurrection’ – that text has quite absorbed me.

THANK YOU Father. May all be well with you.
With my love in Our Risen Lord,
William





Month of May 2015

Month dedicated to Mary

Easter: May 1st

Optional Memorial of St. Joseph the Worker


Month of May 2015, Pope's Intentions


May
  • Universal: That, rejecting the culture of indifference, we may care for our neighbours who suffer, especially the sick and the poor.
  • Evangelization: That Mary's intercession may help Christians in secularized cultures be ready to proclaim Jesus.
See MAGNIFICAT COM, with thanks,.;
Month of May
Await: Front Cover of Artwork and Commentary.
Giuseppe Magni - Adoration
+ + +    
The Year of Consecrated Life;

The Mission of the Resurrection

As we celebrate now the joys and graces of this Easter season, we are drawn into the power of the Lord’s Resurrection. We see it in the transformation of Thomas’ doubt into faith, and in the undoing of Peter’s betrayal by his confession of love. In fact, all of the Apostles are brought from their fear-filled Upper Room to the hope-filled frontiers of the world. This is the living power of the Lord’s Resurrection that remains with the Church to this day.

In Pope Saint John Paul II’s apostolic exhortation Vita Consecrata, he makes mention of the need to perceive consecrated persons in the light of the Resurrection. Because the “Paschal Mystery is the wellspring of the Church’s missionary nature” (#25), it lies at the heart of every vocation to consecrated life. No vocation is for itself alone. Even the cloistered nun and solitary hermit live their consecrated life for the good of the Church, for the conversion of the world to Christ.

“To the extent that consecrated persons live a life completely devoted to the Father (cf. Lk 2:49; Jn 4:34), held fast by Christ (cf. Jn 15:16; Gal 1:15-16), and animated by the Spirit (cf. Lk 24:49; Acts 1:8; 2:4), they cooperate effectively in the mission of the Lord Jesus (cf. Jn 20:21) and contribute in a particularly profound way to the renewal of the world” (VC #25).

Father James M. Sullivan, o.p., serves as director of the Institute for Continuing Theological Education at the Pontifical North American College in Rome.

Previous:
April Month.
The First Mass
To see our Lord Jesus Christ appear in glory, we must await the end of history, when he will come again to judge the living and the dead. This is why when he appears after Easter, in what is called his glorified body, Christ bore no aspect of the triumphant: Mary Magdalene mistook him for the gardener, and the two disciples on the road to Emmaus thought him an ordinary traveler.
But here, represented in the inn at Emmaus, Rembrandt goes further: he doesn’t fear to show us a Jesus yet too human to be the risen One, his face distraught, like a Christ still undergoing his Passion. Thus the Painter of Light illustrates the words of Blaise Pascal, for whom “Christ will be in his death throes until the end of the world.” And it is true: Christ will be in agony as long as evil abounds, and so he is at each Mass—the source and summit of Christian life—making present and active, though without bloodshed, his supreme sacrifice on the cross for the glory of God and the salvation of creation.
On the altar, the Victim is truly the same as on the cross, just as the minister who offers the sacrifice is also the same. For the priest does not consecrate in his own person, but in persona Christi: he does not say, “This is Christ’s Body,” but, “This is my Body….”
Here Rembrandt represents, as it were, the first Mass—the first time in history the reenactment of Christ’s sacrifice was celebrated by Christ himself—after, it must be stressed, a powerful Liturgy of the Word expounded along the road. At the inn of Emmaus, Rembrandt captures Jesus at the very moment he speaks the words and makes the gestures of the Institution: “On the day before he was to suffer, he took bread in his holy and venerable hands, and with eyes raised to heaven, to you, O God, his almighty Father, giving you thanks, he said the blessing, broke the bread, and gave it to his disciples….”
Pierre-Marie Dumont
Christ at Emmaüs (detail), Rembrandt (1606–1669), Louvre Museum, Paris, France. © Musée du Louvre, Dist. RMN-GP / Philippe Fuzeau.